Method and apparatus for transporting data traffic using classifications

ABSTRACT

Apparatus and methods for parsing data traffic into queues for efficient routing and prioritization. In one embodiment, methods and apparatus for backhauling small cell data traffic using existing cable network infrastructure using DOCSIS Low Latency queue capabilities are provided. A data traffic classifier may use a two-stages sorting algorithm, including a first stage classification using IP address information and a second stage classification using differentiated services code point (DSCP) value information. In one implementation, the DSCP values of the data traffic are set using QoS Flow Identification (QFI) values.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/384,701 (TWAR.256A/CHTR-2018-51) entitled“Apparatus and Methods for Enhancing Quality of Experience forOver-the-Top Data Services over High-Capacity Wireless Networks” filedon Apr. 15, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety.

COPYRIGHT

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains materialthat is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentor the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and TrademarkOffice patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrightrights whatsoever.

BACKGROUND 1. Technological Field

The present disclosure relates generally to the field of data networksand wireless or wireline interfaces, and specifically in one aspect, toapparatus and methods for parsing small cell traffic into low latencyand normal queues.

2. Description of Related Technology

Current data communication services are provided using variouscombinations of wireless and wired network infrastructures. Data OverCable Services Interface Specification (DOCSIS) is a telecommunicationstandard that allows the transport of data traffic (e.g., IP packets)over existing cable networks using Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)carriers or aggregations of carriers. DOCSIS may be used by a networkoperator such as a multiple systems operator (MSO) to, inter alia,transmit Internet Protocol data over existing hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC)infrastructure (e.g., to provide broadband Internet access to a customerpremises). In addition, DOCSIS cable backhaul is often used to servicewireless nodes (access points, small cells, femtocells, CBSDs or FWAdevices) in order to transport large amounts of small cell traffic data(e.g., 4G, 4.5G, or 5G traffic) using a cable distribution network(e.g., an HFC network).

In the current data communication environment, network users need toreceive data communication services that require extremely large amountsof data transfer, without suffering a loss in the quality of service(QoS) or the quality of experience (QoE). For example, 5G NR is expectedto provide very low-latency wireless communication (on the order of 1 msor less “round trip”).

The data communication over cable used to backhaul wireless/small celltraffic needs to be able to support certain bandwidth, quality, andlatency requirements. Cable backhaul of small cell traffic may try toprovide quality of service by, inter alia, making sure that traffic thatrequires lower latency (e.g., real-time gaming or virtual or augmentedreality (VR or AR) applications) gets prioritized over other types oftraffic. However, in legacy DOCSIS versions, all traffic ultimately hasto pass through a single queue, and network congestion affects allservices, including traffic requiring low latency.

Current DOCSIS versions (i.e., DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0) specifically provideLow Latency traffic support, including providing a dual-queue mechanismfor all traffic that can help mitigate queueing latency. The dual-queuehas one deep buffer (with active queue management, AQM) forqueue-building traffic, known as the “Classic Queue,” and one shortbuffer (with AQM) for non-queue-building traffic, known as the “LowLatency Queue.” This dual-queue architecture has a simple, nativeclassifier and scheduling mechanism for balancing congestion across thetop queues and assigning traffic to the appropriate queue. By default,the native classifier will (i) sort all traffic marked with DSCP-EF(differentiated services code point, expedited forwarding), trafficmarked with other non-queue-building codepoints, and traffic withexplicit congestion notification (ECN) set to 1 into the Low LatencyQueue, and (ii) sort all other traffic into the Classic Service Flow.However, the native classifier is very “coarse” in terms of granularity;i.e., it is not capable of addressing concerns, requirements, and/orbenefits that a specific vendor, carrier, or network operator (e.g., acable or satellite multiple systems operator or MSO, or a mobile networkoperator or MNO) might otherwise consider or require.

Thus, improved methods and apparatus are needed to address the foregoingdeficiencies. Ideally, a widely applicable and flexible mechanism forgranularly parsing data traffic, based on for example prioritization andQoS requirements, in order to fully take advantage of DOCSIS Low Latencyqueue support, would be provided in such improved solutions. Further, 5GQoS support would ideally be provided, so as to, inter alia, improve theparsing of 5G NR data traffic.

Moreover, such improved apparatus and methods would ideally becompatible with “next generation” plant architectures such as (e.g., inthe cable context) CCAP or Converged Cable Access Platform componentsand structures.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure meets at least the foregoing needs by providing,inter alia, methods and apparatus for parsing data traffic to supportone or more requirements or functions, including prioritization oftraffic according to latency.

In particular, some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosureprovide support for backhauling small cell (e.g., 5G NR/NR-U) datatraffic using MSO (e.g., cable) network infrastructure while takingadvantage of DOCSIS 3.1 and 4.0 Low Latency queue capabilities.

In one aspect of the disclosure, a computerized apparatus configured forclassifying packetized data traffic is disclosed. In one embodiment, thecomputerized apparatus includes: a digital processing apparatus; one ormore network interfaces in communication with the digital processingapparatus; and a storage device in communication with the digitalprocessing apparatus and having at least one computer program disposedthereon in the form of a plurality of instructions.

In one variant, the instructions are configured to, when executed on thedigital processing apparatus: receive a plurality of data packets issuedfrom a user device; access first data from the plurality of data packetsindicative of a destination network address; access second data from theplurality of data packets indicative of a QoS management parameter; andcause utilization of either a low-latency bearer or a best-effortsbearer for carrying the plurality of data packets from the computerizedapparatus to the destination network address based at least on theaccessed second data.

In one implementation, the first data comprises a destination IP addressfor upstream IP packets, and the second data comprises DSCP(differentiated services code point) data. The DSCP (differentiatedservices code point) data comprises DSCP data obtained via an S1interface, and the computerized apparatus comprises a 3GPP Long TermEvolution (LTE) femtocell or node.

In another implementation, the DSCP (differentiated services code point)data comprises DSCP data obtained via an N3 interface, and thecomputerized apparatus comprises a 3GPP 5G NR (New Radio) compliant gNBor wireless node.

In a further embodiment, the plurality of instructions are furtherconfigured to, when executed on the digital processing apparatus,utilize third data within the plurality of data packets, the third datacomprising QFI data found in one or more encapsulation headers of theplurality of data packets.

In another aspect of the disclosure, a method of parsing data trafficinto separate queues is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method isimplemented by a network apparatus in order to meet one or more ofquality of service (QoS) and quality of experience (QoE) standards, andthe separate queues include a Low Latency queue and a Normal/Classicalqueue, as supported by DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0.

In one variant, the data traffic includes small cell wireless trafficgenerated using 5G, 4G, and/or 4.5G network infrastructure. In oneimplementation, the data traffic includes Internet Protocol packets, andthe IP packets include IP headers; e.g., IPv4 or IPv6 headers, IP outerheaders (inside GTP user plane (GTP-U) encapsulated headers), and/or IPinner headers (inside GTP-U headers), and the method includesclassifying data traffic using at least one sorting algorithmimplementing one or more sorting stages and using different sortingparameters. The sorting parameters can include for example IPdestination addresses, IP source addresses, APNs, GWs, DifferentiatedServices Code Point (DSCP) values, QoS Flow Identification (QFI) values,and/or network slice indicators.

In one embodiment, the classification uses the same sortingrule/algorithm to classify upstream/upload (UL) and downstream/download(DL) traffic during all sorting stages of the data trafficclassification process. In another embodiment, the classification usesthe same rule/algorithm to classify UL and DL traffic during one or morethe stages of the classification process, and uses differentrules/algorithms to classify the UL and DL traffic during other stage(s)of the process. In yet another embodiment, the classification usesdifferent rules/algorithms to classify UL and DL traffic during allsorting stages of the classification process.

In another approach, the sorting algorithm(s) use only first sortingparameters to classify the data traffic in one sorting stage. In onesuch variant, the sorting parameters include network slice indicators,and the sorting algorithm classifies data traffic belonging to a networkslice into one of the DOCSIS supported queues. In one implementationthereof, the network slice indicates a low latency services requirement,and the queue is the Low Latency DOCSIS queue. In anotherimplementation, the network slice indicates no low latency requirement,and the queue is the Normal/Classical DOCSIS-supported queue.

In another implementation, the sorting algorithm ignores various otherparameters (e.g., DSCP values) of the individual data packets of thedata traffic belonging to the network slice.

In another variant, the sorting parameters include IP source and/ordestination addresses. For example, the sorting algorithm is configuredto classify data traffic heading towards or originating from particulardestinations as belonging to the Low Latency or Normal queues.

In yet another embodiment, the sorting algorithm uses first sortingparameters to classify the data traffic in a first stage, and secondsorting parameters to re-classify some or all of the data traffic in thesecond stage. The sorting algorithm can in one such adaptation parse thedata traffic into Low Latency and Normal queues, with e.g., the firstsorting parameters including IP destination and/or source addresses, andthe second sorting parameters including DSCP values, or the firstsorting parameters including DSCP values and the second sortingparameters including IP destination and/or source addresses.

In another embodiment, the sorting algorithm (i) evaluates and sortsdata traffic into low latency (LL) and best effort (BE) traffic in thefirst sorting stage, (ii) feeds some or all of the sorted data trafficto the second sorting stage, (iii) evaluates some or all of the datatraffic in the second stage, (iv) re-sorts at least some of theevaluated data traffic into LL and BE in the second sorting stage; and(v) fees the LL and BE data traffic to respective Low Latency and Normalqueues. In one such variant, at least some of the data traffic sorted inthe first sorting stage is fed directly to the Low Latency and/or Normalqueues. In another variant, all of the data traffic sorted in the firstsorting stage is fed to the second sorting stage.

In a further embodiment, a sorting stage may use IP address as a sortingparameter. The sorting algorithm may for example extract/read sourceand/or destination IP addresses from IP headers of data packets, andcompare the source and/or destination IP addresses against one or morelists of prioritized/deprioritized IP addresses. For instance, in oneapproach, the sorting algorithm uses lists of IP addresses to prioritizeor de-prioritize data traffic to or from: (i) certain customers orsubscribers, (ii) certain levels or classes of customers or subscribers,(iii) a network operator's own servers, systems, or services, (iv)network servers providing particular types of services, (v) certaincompanies and businesses, for example, partners or affiliatedcorporations, and/or (v) particular geographic locations.

In one implementation, the IP address may be an individual address, oralternatively one or more ranges of addresses. The lists of IP addressesmay include different tiers of priority, separate lists ofsource/destination addresses for UL traffic, separate lists ofsource/destination addresses for DL traffic, and/or hierarchical listsof addresses (e.g., sorted by priority).

In some variants, the sorting stage that uses IP address(es) for sortingcan include one or a combination of: (i) for all traffic, sorting usingIP source addresses with the same sorting rule/algorithm (e.g., compareagainst the same IP address list); (ii) for all traffic, sorting usingIP destination addresses with the same sorting rule/algorithm; (iii) forall traffic, sorting using IP source and destination addresses with thesame sorting rule/algorithm; (iv) for UL traffic, sort using destinationIP addresses; for DL traffic, sort using source IP addresses; (v) for ULtraffic, sort using source IP addresses; for DL traffic, sort usingdestination IP addresses; (vi) for UL traffic, sort using source anddestination addresses; for DL traffic, sort using either source ordestination addresses; (vii) for UL traffic, sort using either source ordestination addresses; for DL traffic, sort using source and destinationaddresses; (viii) for all traffic, sorting using both source and/ordestination addresses, and apply different rules/algorithms to UL and DLtraffic; (ix) using different address lists/algorithms to sort trafficlabeled as LL or BE in a previous sorting stage.

In another embodiment, a sorting stage uses DSCP values as sortingparameters. The sorting algorithm is configured to extract/read DSCPvalues from data packets and compare the DSCP values against one or morelists of DSCP values. The DSCP values may be read for example from theDS fields of IP headers. In one implementation, the DSCP values arebased on QFI values of 5G NR traffic, and can include hierarchicallistings of DSCP values with one or more DSCP list thresholds (used toe.g., divide the hierarchical listings of DSCP values into tiers). Thesorting algorithm may also use the list(s) of DSCP values to prioritizeand/or de-prioritize types of traffic, e.g., prioritizingvoice/video/live gaming services or AR/VR traffic. In one approach, thesorting stage that uses DSCP values as sorting parameters can includeone or a combination of: (i) for all traffic, DSCP sorting using thesame rules/algorithms (same DSCP listing and thresholds); (ii) DSCPsorting using different rules/algorithms for UL and DL traffic; and(iii) DSCP sorting using different rules/algorithms to sort trafficlabeled as LL or BE in a previous sorting stage.

In yet a further embodiment, the sorting algorithm uses (i) firstsorting parameters to classify the data traffic in a first sortingstage, (ii) second sorting parameters to re-classify some or all of thedata traffic in a second sorting stage, and (iii) third sortingparameters to re-classify some or all of the data traffic in a thirdsorting stage.

In another aspect of the disclosure, a method of delivering digitalcontent to one or more computerized client device via a content deliverynetwork is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includestransporting the digital content in the form of packetized data trafficfrom a content delivery network hub to a network access node using acoaxial cable medium of an HFC cable plant. In one variant, the methodincludes sorting the data traffic into Low Latency and Normal datatraffic, and using respective Low Latency and Normal queues of DOCSIS3.1/4.0 to transport the data traffic over the cable plant. In oneimplementation, the sorting of the data traffic may be performed at aCMTS device. In another variant, the sorting of the data traffic may beperformed at a network entity connected to a CMTS device. In yet anothervariant, the sorting may be performed in an MHAv2 or other CCAP-enabledentity such as an RPD.

In another aspect, a method of backhauling packet data traffic usingcable network infrastructure is disclosed. In one embodiment, the cableinfrastructure is part of an HFC network operated by an MSO and, themethod includes receiving one or more data packets at a network entity(e.g., network access node, small cell, network hub); determining thatthe data packets need to be transported using a cable backhaul; applyinga sorting algorithm to the data packets to sort the data packets intolow latency and normal queues; transmitting the sorted data packets froma cable modem (CM) or a cable modem termination system (CMTS) usingDOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0, such that the sorted data packets are transmittedthrough appropriate Low Latency and Normal queues.

In yet a further aspect, a method of supporting 5G NR network slicingfunctionality is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method includes:obtaining data traffic; determining that the data traffic belongs to anetwork slice; determining one or parameters associated with the networkslice (e.g., security/privacy/bandwidth/privacy requirements); based onthe one or more parameters, selecting either a first (e.g., Low Latency)or second (e.g., Normal or non-low latency) queue for transmission ofthe data traffic; and sending the data traffic via a bearer medium usingat least the selected queue. In one variant, one of the parameters is alow latency requirement for the network slice, and the method includesselecting the first queue for the traffic.

In another aspect, a classification apparatus (CA) configured toclassify data traffic is disclosed. In one embodiment, theclassification apparatus is in data communication with a cable modem(CM) or a cable modem termination system (CMTS). In one variant, theclassification apparatus includes: a digital processing apparatus; adata interface in communication with the digital processing apparatus;and a storage device in data communication with the digital processingapparatus and having at least one computer program disposed thereon inthe form of a plurality of computer-executable instructions.

In one implementation, the at least one computer program is configuredto, when executed on the digital processing apparatus: receive datapackets; extract information from the data packets; based on theextracted information, parse the data packets into different ones of aplurality of queues or other data retention structures, and transmit theparsed data packets through the queues consistent with an extant PHYqueuing approach.

In a further aspect, a network apparatus configured to enabletransportation of packetized data traffic through an HFC cable plant isdisclosed. In one embodiment, the network apparatus is a wirelessnetwork access node compliant with a 3GPP 4G/4.5G/5G standard (e.g.,LTE, LTE-LAA, or 5G NR-U). The access node may use for example licensedor unlicensed or quasi-licensed (e.g., CBRS GAA or PAL) spectrum. In oneembodiment, the network apparatus includes: a digital processingapparatus; a data interface in data communication with the digitalprocessing apparatus and configured for data communication with acomputerized client device; a data classifier apparatus in communicationwith the processor apparatus; and a storage device in data communicationwith the digital processing apparatus and having at least one computerprogram disposed thereon in the form of a plurality ofcomputer-executable instructions.

In one variant, the at least one computer program is configured to, whenexecuted on the digital processing apparatus, receive one or more datapackets from the computerized client device, sort the data packets intodifferent queues, and transmit the sorted data packets throughrespective queue mechanisms. In one implementation, the networkapparatus is integrated with a wireless small cell or femtocell or CBRSCBSD and includes a DOCSIS-based modem functionality for backhaul of thedata to the HFC cable plant.

In one aspect, a content delivery network architecture configured toenable prioritized or optimized transportation of packetized datatraffic through cable infrastructure is disclosed. In one embodiment,the content delivery network includes an HFC distribution network, oneor more gateway devices, and one or more wireless network access nodes.In one embodiment, the content delivery network is configured to providecontent/services to a plurality of computerized client devices via theone or more access nodes.

In another aspect, a method of providing vendor- or carrier-specificdata packet routing using queueing is disclosed.

In yet a further aspect, methods and apparatus supporting selective 5GNR network slicing within a managed content distribution network aredisclosed.

In another aspect, an integrated circuit (IC) device implementing one ormore of the foregoing aspects of data packet routing or prioritizationor processing is disclosed and described. In one embodiment, the ICdevice is embodied as a SoC (system on Chip) device. In anotherembodiment, an ASIC (application specific IC) is used as the basis ofthe device. In yet another embodiment, a chip set (i.e., multiple ICsused in coordinated fashion) is disclosed. In yet another embodiment,the device comprises a multi-logic block FPGA device.

In another aspect, a computer readable storage apparatus implementingone or more of the foregoing aspects is disclosed and described. In oneembodiment, the computer readable apparatus comprises a program memory,or an EEPROM. In another embodiment, the apparatus includes a solidstate drive (SSD) or other mass storage device. In another embodiment,the apparatus comprises a USB or other “flash drive” or other suchportable removable storage device. In yet another embodiment, theapparatus comprises a “cloud” (network) based storage device which isremote from yet accessible via a computerized user or client electronicdevice.

In another aspect of the disclosure, methods and apparatus for sortingand prioritizing data within a CCAP architecture are disclosed. In onevariant, the CCAP architecture uses an M-CMTS apparatus as part of itsMHA (modular headend architecture). In another variant, a fullyintegrated CCAP headend is used.

These and other aspects shall become apparent when considered in lightof the disclosure provided herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a logical block diagram illustrating one embodiment of ageneralized method for sorting data traffic, according to the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 1A is a logical block diagram illustrating one implementation ofthe generalized method of FIG. 1, adapted for DOCSIS queuing.

FIG. 1B is a graph of Low Latency queue data traffic weight/priority,according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1C is a graph of Normal queue data traffic weight/priority,according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a logical flow diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment ofa method for sorting data traffic, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 2A is a logical flow diagram illustrating one implementation of themethod for sorting data traffic, according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 2B is a logical flow diagram illustrating another implementation ofthe method for sorting data traffic, according to the presentdisclosure.

FIGS. 2C and 2D are graphical illustrations of exemplary IP packetprotocols (IPv4 and IPv6) useful with various embodiments of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 2E is a table illustrating exemplary DSCP values enumeratingdifferent traffic types.

FIG. 2F is a graphical illustration of exemplary IP address lists usefulfor sorting data traffic, according to one embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 2G is an illustration of an exemplary DSCP list useful for sortingdata traffic, according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a logical flow diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment ofa method for sorting data traffic, according to one embodiment of thepresent disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a logical flow diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment ofa method for backhauling edge device (e.g., small cell data) traffic,according to the present disclosure.

FIG. 4A is an exemplary communication (“ladder”) diagram according toone embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4B illustrates another exemplary method for backhauling datatraffic using DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0 over a cable bearer, in accordance withaspects of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a functional block diagram of an exemplary networkarchitecture comprising various features of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram of an exemplary MSO networkarchitecture useful in conjunction with various features describedherein.

FIG. 7 is a functional block diagram illustrating an exemplaryconfiguration of a network access node, according to one embodiment ofthe present disclosure.

FIG. 8 is a functional block diagram of one embodiment of a gNBarchitecture including CU with classifier apparatus and multiple DUs.

All figures © Copyright 2019 Charter Communications Operating, LLC. Allrights reserved.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference is now made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer tolike parts throughout.

As used herein, the term “application” refers generally and withoutlimitation to a unit of executable software that implements a certainfunctionality or theme. The themes of applications vary broadly acrossany number of disciplines and functions (such as on-demand contentmanagement, e-commerce transactions, brokerage transactions, homeentertainment, calculator etc.), and one application may have more thanone theme. The unit of executable software generally runs in apredetermined environment; for example, the unit could include adownloadable Java Xlet™ that runs within the JavaTV™ environment.

As used herein, the term “CBRS” refers without limitation to the CBRSarchitecture and protocols described in Signaling Protocols andProcedures for Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS): Spectrum AccessSystem (SAS)—Citizens Broadband Radio Service Device (CBSD) InterfaceTechnical Specification—Document WINNF-TS-0016, Version V1.2.1. 3,January 2018, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and anyrelated documents or subsequent versions thereof.

As used herein, the term “client device” includes, but is not limitedto, CPE, set-top boxes (e.g., DSTBs), gateways, modems, personalcomputers (PCs), and minicomputers, whether desktop, laptop, orotherwise, and mobile devices such as handheld computers, PDAs, personalmedia devices (PMDs), tablets, “phablets”, and smartphones, IoT devices,and vehicle infotainment systems.

As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant toinclude any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which performa function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programminglanguage or environment including, for example, C/C++, Fortran, COBOL,PASCAL, Ruby, Python, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML,SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environmentssuch as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™(including J2ME, Java Beans, etc.) and the like.

The term “Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)” refers without limitationto any type of electronic equipment located within a customer's orsubscriber's premises and connected to or in communication with anetwork.

As used herein, the terms “Internet” and “internet” are usedinterchangeably to refer to inter-networks including, withoutlimitation, the Internet.

As used herein, the term “memory” includes any type of integratedcircuit or other storage device adapted for storing digital dataincluding, without limitation, ROM. PROM, EEPROM, DRAM, SDRAM, DDR/2SDRAM, GDDRx, EDO/FPMS, RLDRAM, SRAM, “flash” memory (e.g., NAND/NOR),3D memory, and PSRAM.

As used herein, the terms “microprocessor” and “processor” or “digitalprocessor” are meant generally to include all types of digitalprocessing devices including, without limitation, digital signalprocessors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC),general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g.,FPGAs), PLDs, reconfigurable computer fabrics (RCFs), array processors,GPUs, secure microprocessors, and application-specific integratedcircuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a singleunitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.

As used herein, the terms “MSO” or “multiple systems operator” refer toa cable, satellite, or terrestrial network provider havinginfrastructure required to deliver services including programming anddata over those mediums.

As used herein, the terms “MNO” or “mobile network operator” refer to acellular, satellite phone, WMAN (e.g., 802.16), or other network serviceprovider having infrastructure required to deliver services includingwithout limitation voice and data over those mediums. The term “MNO” asused herein is further intended to include MVNOs, MNVAs, and MVNEs.

As used herein, the terms “network” and “bearer network” refer generallyto any type of telecommunications or data network including, withoutlimitation, optical networks (such as PONs), hybrid fiber coax (HFC)networks, satellite networks, telco networks, and data networks(including MANs, WANs, LANs, WLANs, internets, and intranets). Suchnetworks or portions thereof may utilize any one or more differenttopologies (e.g., ring, bus, star, loop, etc.), transmission media(e.g., optical fiber, wired/RF cable, RF wireless, millimeter wave,etc.) and/or communications or networking protocols (e.g., SONET,DOCSIS, IEEE Std 802.3, ATM, X.25, Frame Relay, 3GPP, 3GPP2, WAP, SIP,UDP, FTP, RTP/RTCP, TCP/IP, H.323, etc.).

As used herein, the term “DOCSIS” refers to any of the existing orplanned variants of the Data Over Cable Services InterfaceSpecification, including for example DOCSIS versions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0,3.1, and 4.0 (previously, Full Duplex 3.1). As used herein, the term“legacy DOCSIS” refers to all DOCSIS version preceding DOCSIS 3.1 and“current DOCSIS” refers to DOCSIS versions 3.1 and 4.0.

As used herein, the term “headend” or “backend” refers generally to anetworked system controlled by an operator (e.g., an MSO) thatdistributes programming to MSO clientele using client devices, orprovides other services such as high-speed data delivery and backhaul.

As used herein, the term “cable modem termination system” (CMTS) referswithout limitation to a device located at a cable system headend ofdistribution hub, which provides complementary functionality to thecable modems to enable data connectivity to a wide-area network.

As used herein, the term “LTE” refers to, without limitation and asapplicable, any of the variants or Releases of the 3GPP Long-TermEvolution wireless communication standard, including LTE-U (Long TermEvolution in unlicensed spectrum), LTE-LAA (Long Term Evolution,Licensed Assisted Access), LTE-A (LTE Advanced), 4G LTE, WiMAX, VoLTE(Voice over LTE), and other wireless data standards.

As used herein the terms “5G” and “New Radio (NR)” refer withoutlimitation to apparatus, methods or systems compliant with 3GPP Release15, and any modifications, subsequent Releases, or amendments orsupplements thereto which are directed to New Radio technology, whetherlicensed or unlicensed.

As used herein, the term “distributed unit” or “DU” refers withoutlimitation to a distributed logical node within a wireless networkinfrastructure. For example, a DU might be embodied as a 5G/NR gNBDistributed Unit (gNB-DU), which is a logical node hosting RLC, MAC andPHY layers of the gNB or en-gNB, and its operation is partly controlledby gNB-CU (referenced above). One gNB-DU supports one or multiple cells,yet a given cell is supported by only one gNB-DU. The gNB-DU terminatesthe F1 interface connected with the gNB-CU.

As used herein, the term “network interface” refers to any signal ordata interface with a component or network including, withoutlimitation, those of the FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.),Thunderbolt, USB (e.g., USB 2.0, USB 3.0, etc.), DisplayPort, NVLink,Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.),MoCA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band orOOB, cable modem, etc.), Wi-Fi (802.11), WiMAX (802.16), Zigbee®,Z-wave, PAN (e.g., 802.15 or BLE), power line carrier (PLC), or IrDAfamilies.

As used herein, the term “server” refers to any computerized component,system or entity regardless of form which is adapted to provide data,files, applications, content, or other services to one or more otherdevices or entities on a computer network.

As used herein, the term “QAM” refers to modulation schemes used forsending signals over cable networks. Such modulation scheme might useany constellation level (e.g. QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM, 256-QAM, etc.)depending on details of a cable network. A QAM may also refer to aphysical channel modulated according to the schemes.

As used herein, the term “storage” refers to without limitation computerhard drives, SSDs, DVR devices, flash drives, memory, RAID devices orarrays, optical media (e.g., CD-ROMs, Laserdiscs, Blu-Ray, etc.), or anyother devices or media capable of storing content or other information.

As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data,communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi,Bluetooth, 3G (3GPP/3GPP2), HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A,WCDMA, etc.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20,Zigbee®, Z-wave, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, LTE/LTE-A, 5G NR,analog cellular, CDPD, satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwavesystems, acoustic, and infrared (i.e., IrDA).

Overview

The present disclosure provides, inter alia, improved methods andapparatus for providing high quality, low latency cable-basedtransmission using extant protocols and infrastructure (e.g., DOCSIS 3.1or 4.0) for backhauling data traffic (e.g., that being transacted with a4G, 4.5G, or 5G NR wireless access node or “small cell”). In one aspect,the present disclosure seeks to granularly parse small cell data trafficinto different categories (e.g., Low Latency and Normal queues assupported by the DOCSIS 3.1 and 4.0 standards) using one or more ofpacket source/destination address information, gateway information, DSCPvalues, and/or QFI values.

In one exemplary embodiment, a method and apparatus are provided forparsing 5G NR data traffic in order to transport the data trafficthrough existing cable (e.g., HFC) infrastructure (e.g., using DOCSIS3.1/4.0 Low Latency support) to meet required QoS/QoE or otherperformance requirements. The 5G NR data traffic may be provided in theform of protocol data units (PDUs) having IP headers encapsulated byGTP-U headers via a 5G network node (e.g., a small cell) having abackhaul cable connection to an MSO network infrastructure. In onevariant, a classifier apparatus and cable modem are integrated with thenetwork node for processing and forwarding the data traffic to meet theabove-referenced performance requirements. The classifier apparatusextracts and reads the IP source address, the IP destination address,and the DSCP value from IP headers of the data traffic. The sortingalgorithm of the classifier may use the IP source and/or destinationaddresses to perform an initial (i.e., “stage 1”) classification/parsingof the data traffic the stage 1 sorting process is then used to givepriority to data packets received from or being transmitted topredetermined network entities, for example, customers/subscribers,customers/subscribers having a particular subscription level, particularcompanies/businesses, network operator's own servers/services,particular network servers or services, to support a particular 5G NRnetwork slice, etc. In one implementation, the sorting algorithm mayprioritize certain destination IP addresses for upstream data traffic(e.g., traffic from small cell) and certain source IP addresses fordownstream data traffic (e.g., traffic from HFC network to a small cell)over other types of traffic such as that with inherently lowerperformance requirements.

The sorting algorithm may also perform a second (“stage 2”)classification/parsing of the data traffic using for instance DSCPvalues in order to, in effect, re-classify the priority of some of thestage 1-sorted data packets. The DSCP values may be based for example ona QFI of the 5G NR data packets. In one approach, the sorting algorithmcompares DSCP values of the data packets against a predetermined list ororder of DSCP values (the latter which may itself be sorted bypriority).

In one embodiment, the classifier apparatus uses the two stages of thesorting algorithm to parse the data traffic into Low Latency andNormal/Best Effort queues, as supported by the DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 standards.The parsed data traffic is fed into appropriate Low Latency and Normalqueues, such that the Low Latency queue data packets are scheduled witha strict priority while the Normal queue data packets are scheduled witha weighted priority (e.g., order of packets within the Normal queue maybe dynamically adjusted, such as based on operator input or based onalgorithmic input from a supervisory or other process).

The foregoing method and apparatus advantageously make use of existingpacket data (e.g., IP addresses and DSCP values) to parse small celldata traffic that is slated for transmission over a cable plant, inorder to take advantage of current DOCSIS QoS support for achievingMSO-specific requirements or goals for handling of the traffic (e.g., toensure that MSO users or subscribers have the best possible QoE whenutilizing the MSO's infrastructure). This capability is particularlyuseful to the MSO deploying unlicensed spectrum assets (e.g., NR-Udevices) at its customer or subscriber premises, since extant cabledrops and backhaul can be used to support the high performancerequirements of 5G technology without having to install or replace suchbackhaul with e.g., fiber or another medium.

Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiments

Exemplary embodiments of the apparatus and methods of the presentdisclosure are now described in detail. While these exemplaryembodiments are described in the context of the previously mentionedwireless access nodes (e.g., small cells) associated with or supportedat least in part by a managed network of a service provider (e.g., MSOand/or MNO networks), other types of radio access technologies (“RATs”),other types of networks and architectures that are configured to deliverdigital data (e.g., text, images, games, software applications, videoand/or audio) may be used consistent with the present disclosure. Suchother networks or architectures may be broadband, narrowband, orotherwise, the following therefore being merely exemplary in nature.

It will also be appreciated that while described generally in thecontext of a network providing service to a customer or consumer or enduser or subscriber (i.e., within a prescribed service area, venue, orother type of premises), the present disclosure may be readily adaptedto other types of environments including, e.g., outdoors,commercial/retail, or enterprise domain (e.g., businesses), or evengovernmental uses. Yet other applications are possible.

Other features and advantages of the present disclosure will immediatelybe recognized by persons of ordinary skill in the art with reference tothe attached drawings and detailed description of exemplary embodimentsas given below.

Wireless

As a brief aside multitude of wireless networking technologies, alsoknown as Radio Access Technologies (“RATs”), provide the underlyingmeans of connection for radio-based communication networks to userdevices. Such RATs often utilize licensed radio frequency spectrum(i.e., that allocated by the FCC per the Table of Frequency Allocationsas codified at Section 2.106 of the Commission's Rules). Currently onlyfrequency bands between 9 kHz and 275 GHz have been allocated (i.e.,designated for use by one or more terrestrial or space radiocommunication services or the radio astronomy service under specifiedconditions). For example, a typical cellular service provider mightutilize spectrum for so-called “3G” (third generation), “4G” (fourthgeneration), and “5G” (fifth generation) wireless communications asshown in Table 1 below:

TABLE 1 Technology Bands 3G 850 MHz Cellular, Band 5 (GSM/GPRS/EDGE).1900 MHz PCS, Band 2 (GSM/GPRS/EDGE). 850 MHz Cellular, Band 5(UMTS/HSPA+ up to 21 Mbit/s). 1900 MHz PCS, Band 2 (UMTS/HSPA+ up to 21Mbit/s). 4G 700 MHz Lower B/C, Band 12/17 (LTE). 850 MHz Cellular, Band5 (LTE). 1700/2100 MHz AWS, Band 4 (LTE). 1900 MHz PCS, Band 2 (LTE).2300 MHz WCS, Band 30 (LTE). 5G 600 MHz 800 MHz 900 MHz 2500 MHz 3550MHz 3700-4200 MHz 28 GHz 37 GHz 39 GHz 47 GHz

Alternatively, unlicensed spectrum may be utilized, such as that withinthe so-called ISM-bands. The ISM bands are defined by the ITU RadioRegulations (Article 5) in footnotes 5.138, 5.150, and 5.280 of theRadio Regulations. In the United States, uses of the ISM bands aregoverned by Part 18 of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)rules, while Part 15 contains the rules for unlicensed communicationdevices, even those that share ISM frequencies. Table 2 below showstypical ISM frequency allocations:

TABLE 2 Frequency range Type Center frequency Availability Licensedusers 6.765 MHz- A 6.78 MHz Subject to local Fixed service & mobile6.795 MHz acceptance service 13.553 MHz- B 13.56 MHz Worldwide Fixed &mobile services 13.567 MHz except aeronautical mobile (R) service 26.957MHz- B 27.12 MHz Worldwide Fixed & mobile service 27.283 MHz exceptaeronautical mobile service, CB radio 40.66 MHz- B 40.68 MHz WorldwideFixed, mobile services & 40.7 MHz earth exploration-satellite service433.05 MHz- A 433.92 MHz only in Region 1, amateur service & 434.79 MHzsubject to local radiolocation service, acceptance additional apply theprovisions of footnote 5.280 902 MHz- B 915 MHz Region 2 only Fixed,mobile except 928 MHz (with some aeronautical mobile & exceptions)radiolocation service; in Region 2 additional amateur service 2.4 GHz- B2.45 GHz Worldwide Fixed, mobile, 2.5 GHz radiolocation, amateur &amateur-satellite service 5.725 GHz- B 5.8 GHz WorldwideFixed-satellite, 5.875 GHz radiolocation, mobile, amateur &amateur-satellite service 24 GHz- B 24.125 GHz Worldwide Amateur,amateur-satellite, 24.25 GHz radiolocation & earth exploration-satelliteservice (active) 61 GHz- A 61.25 GHz Subject to local Fixed,inter-satellite, mobile 61.5 GHz acceptance & radiolocation service 122GHz- A 122.5 GHz Subject to local Earth exploration-satellite 123 GHzacceptance (passive), fixed, inter- satellite, mobile, space research(passive) & amateur service 244 GHz- A 245 GHz Subject to localRadiolocation, radio 246 GHz acceptance astronomy, amateur &amateur-satellite service

ISM bands are also been shared with (non-ISM) license-freecommunications applications such as wireless sensor networks in the 915MHz and 2.450 GHz bands, as well as wireless LANs (e.g., Wi-Fi) andcordless phones in the 915 MHz, 2.450 GHz, and 5.800 GHz bands.

Additionally, the 5 GHz band has been allocated for use by, e.g., WLANequipment, as shown in Table 3:

TABLE 3 Dynamic Freq. Selection Band Name Frequency Band Required (DFS)?UNII-1 5.15 to 5.25 GHz No UNII-2 5.25 to 5.35 GHz Yes UNII-2 Extended5.47 to 5.725 GHz Yes UNII-3 5.725 to 5.825 GHz No

User client devices (e.g., smartphone, tablet, phablet, laptop,smartwatch, or other wireless-enabled devices, mobile or otherwise)generally support multiple RATs that enable the devices to connect toone another, or to networks (e.g., the Internet, intranets, orextranets), often including RATs associated with both licensed andunlicensed spectrum. In particular, wireless access to other networks byclient devices is made possible by wireless technologies that utilizenetworked hardware, such as a wireless access point (“WAP” or “AP”),small cells, femtocells, or cellular towers, serviced by a backend orbackhaul portion of service provider network (e.g., a cable network). Auser may generally access the network at a node or “hotspot,” a physicallocation at which the user may obtain access by connecting to modems,routers, APs, etc. that are within wireless range.

One wireless technology in widespread use is Long-Term Evolutionstandard (also colloquially referred to as “LTE,” “4G,” “LTE Advanced,”among others). An LTE network is powered by an Evolved Packet Core(“EPC”), an Internet Protocol (IP)-based network architecture andeNodeB—Evolved NodeB or E-UTRAN node which part of the Radio AccessNetwork (RAN), capable of providing high-speed wireless datacommunication services to many wireless-enabled devices of users with awide coverage area.

5G New Radio (NR) and NG-RAN (Next Generation Radio Area Network)—

NG-RAN or “NextGen RAN (Radio Area Network)” is part of the 3GPP “5G”next generation radio system. 3GPP is currently specifying Release 15NG-RAN, its components, and interactions among the involved nodesincluding so-called “gNBs” (next generation Node B's or eNBs). NG-RANwill provide very high-bandwidth, very low-latency (e.g., on the orderof 1 ms or less “round trip”) wireless communication and efficientlyutilize, depending on application, both licensed and unlicensed spectrumof the type described supra in a wide variety of deployment scenarios,including indoor “spot” use, urban “macro” (large cell) coverage, ruralcoverage, use in vehicles, and “smart” grids and structures. NG-RAN willalso integrate with 4G/4.5G systems and infrastructure, and moreover newLTE entities are used (e.g., an “evolved” LTE eNB or “eLTE eNB” whichsupports connectivity to both the EPC (Evolved Packet Core) and the NR“NGC” (Next Generation Core).

In some aspects, exemplary Release 15 NG-RAN leverages technology andfunctions of extant LTE/LTE-A technologies (colloquially referred to as4G or 4.5G), as bases for further functional development andcapabilities. For instance, in an LTE-based network, upon startup, aneNB (base station) establishes S1-AP connections towards the MME(mobility management entity) whose commands the eNB is expected toexecute. An eNB can be responsible for multiple cells (in other words,multiple Tracking Area Codes corresponding to E-UTRAN Cell GlobalIdentifiers). The procedure used by the eNB to establish theaforementioned S1-AP connection, together with the activation of cellsthat the eNB supports, is referred to as the S1 SETUP procedure; seeinter alia, 3GPP TS 36.413 V14.4. entitled “3rd Generation PartnershipProject; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; EvolvedUniversal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); S1 ApplicationProtocol (S1AP) (Release 14)” dated September 2017, which isincorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Exemplary Methods—

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture 100 for parsing datatraffic 102 according to e.g., prioritization. In the illustratedexample, the incoming data traffic 102 is parsed via a first stage(“Stage 1”) process 103 and a second stage process 105 before beingallocated to primary and secondary queues or buffers 104, 106. As shownin FIG. 1, the first stage sorting process 103 will parse or sort thedata packets according to a first category (A) and second category (B)based on e.g., a top-level or primary sort criterion, while the secondstage further sorts the Stage-1 sorted packets according to asecond-level criterion. This approach advantageously allows for instancethe MSO or other network operator to achieve a much higher level ofgranularity on its data traffic, including low-latency 5G-relatedtraffic which must obey certain QoS/latency requirements.

It will be appreciated that the queues or buffers 104, 106 shown in FIG.1 may comprise any number of different configurations (e.g., FIFO orotherwise), and may also include multiple individual queues or buffers,such as for overflow (e.g., as one queue/buffer is filled, it “spillsover” to a second queue/buffer, and so forth). Moreover, thequeues/buffers may also be implemented as partitioned portions of memoryor addressable storage space within the same device (e.g., a commonSRAM).

The multiple stages of the architecture of FIG. 1 may also be“pipelined” or made lock-step from the standpoint of data flowingtherethrough, such as e.g., where the sorting process of Stage 1 103must be completed on a prescribed portion of the data before Stage 2processing completed, such as according to a clocking domain. Otherschemes for managing data flow through the architecture 100 will berecognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.

It will also be appreciated that the architecture 100 may utilizemultiple stages of sorting (which may include other processing) thatoccur without an intervening queue or buffer structure. That is, theStage 1 and Stage 2 processing may be accomplished algorithmicallywithout any physical segregation of packets until delivery to queues orbuffers at the outlet of the Stage 2 process(es).

FIG. 1A illustrates one implementation 120 of the architecture of FIG.1, specifically in terms of Low Latency (LL) and Normal/Best Effortqueues, The Low Latency queue 124 contains the set of data packets thatare awaiting transmission on the “Low Latency Service Flow”, as definedby DOCSIS 3.1/4.0, while the Normal queue 126 contains the set of datapackets that are awaiting transmission on the “Classic Service Flow”, asdefined by DOCSIS 3.1/4.0.

The data traffic 122 may be packetized traffic (e.g., encoded digitalcontent carried within a packet or frame structure or protocol) receivedat a network node belonging to, e.g. a small cell network and an MSOnetwork. The node can take any number of form factors, including (i)co-located with other MSO equipment, such as in a physically securedspace of the MSO, (ii) “strand” or pole mounted, (iii) surface mounted,and (iv) buried, so as to inter alia, facilitate most efficientintegration with the extant HFC (and optical) infrastructure, as well asother 4G/4.5G/5G components. The data traffic 122 is processed (i.e.parse) for DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 transmission using a classifier apparatus. Asnoted above, the classifier apparatus may be located at the networknode, within or in physical proximity to a cable modem, at anothernetwork device (off-premises), and/or distributed/virtualized within thenetwork architecture. Ideally, to minimize latency, exemplaryembodiments of the disclosure utilize the classifier apparatus withinthe wireless access node (e.g., 5G gNB controller unit or CU; see FIG. 8herein), thereby obviating any intervening transmission or processing byanother entity. To that end, the present disclosure also contemplatesthat the classifier apparatus may also reside within an MNO 5G RAN ornetwork component, such as an AMF or even the 5GC.

Referring again to the embodiment of FIG. 1A, during the first sortingstage 123, the data traffic 122 is initially classified using firstparameters into initial Low Latency (LL) traffic and Normal/Best Effort(BE) traffic. During the second sorting stage 125, the data traffic issorted using second parameters such that: (i) some of the initial LLtraffic (B_(BE)) is re-classified into the Normal queue; (ii) some ofthe initial Normal traffic (C_(LL)) is re-classified into the LL queue;(iii) some of the original LL traffic (A_(LL)) stays in the LL queue;and (iv) some of the original BE traffic) (D_(BE)) stays in the BEqueue. After the second sorting stage 125, the reclassified traffic istransmitted to the appropriate Low Latency 124 or Normal 126 queues ofthe DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 process backhauling the node (e.g., wireless accessnode or gNB).

In one embodiment, the traffic scheduled for the Low Latency queue 124(A_(LL) and C_(LL)) follows a strict priority, independent of trafficpatterns/buffer size, i.e., as illustrated in FIG. 1B, all of theoriginally (stage 1) sorted Low Latency traffic (A_(LL)) has priority(weight) over traffic that has been re-sorted into the Low Latency queue104 during stage 2 (C_(LL)). In addition, the Low Latency queue 124should not actually build up a large buffer, since by definition it isdesigned to pass on traffic with low latency. The traffic scheduled fortransmission through the Normal (Classical) queue 126 does not adhere toa strict priority. The data packets in the Normal queue 126 may bedynamically assigned different priorities (within the Normal queue 126itself) based on traffic flow/buffer size. For example, as illustratedin FIG. 1C, the originally sorted Best Effort traffic (D_(BE)) mayreceive lower priority than traffic that has been re-sorted into theNormal queue (B_(BE)) until the Normal queue 106 reaches a certain size(vertical dotted line), at which point the priority of the originallysorted Best Effort traffic starts to rise, and eventually overtakes thepriority of the re-sorted traffic.

In one implementation, the foregoing non-linearity or change in queuelogic is configured so that the traffic in the B queue is notcontinuously blocked by the D traffic (i.e., the D queue traffic doesnot block or lock out the B queue traffic indefinitely or even forprotracted periods). In one configuration, the D queue traffic hashigher priority unless the B queue fills to a certain point (which maybe operator specified, or alternatively selected by one or morealgorithms based on e.g., AI or ML such as those based on trafficlatency and/or queue levels or some other metric(s) of blocking) atwhich point the B queue traffic then has priority for some prescribedperiod of time or until another criterion is met (which may also beuser-specified or algorithmically determined).

As such, the present disclosure also contemplates a variety of otherschemes for determining differential rules or logic to be applied toqueuing consistent with the methods and apparatus described herein, suchas in different operational scenarios or conditions within the plant. Itwill also be recognized that criteria and logic may be mixed acrossdifferent queue instances, and even for the same queue instance atdifferent times or in different applications.

In one embodiment, the first (Stage 1) parameters may includeaddress/location information, such as one or a combination of: (i) IPsource addresses, (ii) IP destination addresses, (iii) access pointnames (APNs), and/or (iv) GW names/addresses. Likewise, addresses orother nomenclature or identifiers associated with other network nodes orendpoints that can be used as a basis for classification into services(or classes of services) that are then used to prioritize traffic. Asone example of the foregoing, the first sorting stage may be used toinitially sort all upstream IP packets based on their destination IPaddresses (e.g., prioritize traffic headed to one or more particular MSOservers), and sort all downstream headed packets based on their sourceIP addresses (e.g., prioritize traffic originating from servers known toprovide live video or AR/VR/gaming content). The second parameters(Stage 2) may include for example DSCP markings (which may be based onQFI values). For example, some of the data traffic originally sortedinto the Normal queue may be resorted into the LL queue according to ahigh priority DSCP value (e.g., DSCP=46, traffic requiring expeditedservices).

In a second embodiment, the first parameters (Stage 1) include DSCP/QFIvalues and the second parameters (Stage 2) include address/locationinformation; i.e., the data traffic is originally sorted according toDSCP values, and then partially re-sorted based on source/destinationinformation.

In another embodiment, the first parameters may include source addressinformation, and the second parameters may include destination addressinformation. For example, for upstream traffic (i.e., from the accessnode toward the MSO or MNO core), the classifier might initially sortbased only on destination addresses (e.g., is a subscriber requestheading towards a priority network server), and then reclassify some ofthe traffic based on source addresses (e.g., does the request originatefrom a high-priority subscriber). In one variant, the traffic mayfurther be evaluated and reclassified again using DSCP/QFI values usinga third sorting stage of the classifier (not shown). To that end, itwill be appreciated that the exemplary two-stage approach shown in theembodiments of FIGS. 1-2B herein may be modified to include one or moreadditional stages, whether after Stage 2 or interposed between Stages 1and 2. For instance, a third stage may be added after Stage 2 in theabove architectures to further refine sorting of the packets based on asubnet mask (e.g., one stage sorts based on a network identifier/routingprefix field, and the subsequent stage on a subnet/host identifier).

It will also be appreciated that a single (or multiple) sorting stage(s)may be used to classify all traffic in a particular network slice asbelonging to either the Low Latency or the Normal queue, andaddress/DSCP information is not used in the classification. As a briefaside, 5G NR Network slicing provides for creation of a logicalend-to-end network. Slices are dynamically created, and different slicescan be utilized for different services types. For instance, committedservices can be allocated to different slice types, or slices can beallocated to dedicated customers. Components of a given slice mayinclude 5G Core network (CP and UP) components, 5G RAN components, andInterworking Functions to non-3GPP Access Networks. In general, a UE canconnect a maximum of eight (8) slices in parallel, and utilizes a commonAMF in all such slices.

Per TS 23.501, slice identification can include the S-NSSAI (SingleNetwork Slice Selection Assistance Information, having an SST (slicetype which describes expected network behavior) and an SD (slicedifferentiator for further differentiation). Moreover, the S-NSSAI SSTcan have standard or network-specific values; e.g., eMBB (enhancedmobile broadband), URLCC (ultra-reliable low-latency communications), orMIoT (massive IoT). Similarly, an NSSAI is a collection of a maximum ofeight (8) S-NSSAI values; for example, in operation, a UE may send theNSSAI based on which related slice(s) are selected.

Hence, one or more stages of the architecture discussed above mayutilize one or more of the foregoing S-NSSAI, NSSAI, or other values asa criterion or bases for sorting (e.g., all URLCC SST values are sortedinto the low-latency queue).

It is also appreciated that the sorting stages may be dynamically (i)reconfigured, and/or (ii) added subtracted from the “pipeline.” Forexample, in one configuration, the stages are reprogrammable (such asvia an FPGA or other high-speed configurable processing element) suchthat a given classifier apparatus can be reconfigured on-the-fly toimplement different sorting models depending on the needs of userdevices or services types served. For instance, where a certain type ofuse device/use scenario may benefit from a two-stage model havingDSCP/destination address sorting approach, another user device/scenariomay benefit instead from a SST/DSCP/address model, and so forth.

FIGS. 2-2B illustrate various exemplary embodiments of methods 200, 220,240 for classifying data traffic into low latency and normal queues,according to the present disclosure.

Referring first to the embodiment of FIG. 2, data traffic is received bya classifier apparatus or process in step 202. As described subsequentlyherein, the classifier apparatus/process may be located at customerpremises, at a network node (e.g., within a wireless access node or 5GNR gNB), at or inside a cable modem, at or inside a cable modemtermination system, and/or other parts of the network architecture. Inaddition, some of the functions of the classifier apparatus (e.g.,sorting algorithm) may be distributed at various network locations,including in cloud server(s) and associated storage.

In one embodiment, the data traffic includes IP packet data in the formof protocol data units (PDUs). The data packets include IP headers(e.g., IPv4 or IPv6 headers; see FIGS. 2C and 2D), and may additionallybe encapsulated by GTP-U headers. At a high level, GTP-U (GTPS tunnelingprotocol) is used to tunnel IP packets in 4G and 4.5G networks. Inaddition, 3GPP RAN and CT4 have decided to use GTP-U as the 5G userplane encapsulation protocol between the RAN (gNB) and the user planefunction (UPF).

Per TS.38.415, a G-PDU is a PDU that includes a GTP-U header, while aT-PDU is a PDU that the GTP-U header encapsulates.

Data packets having headers encapsulated by GTP-U retain all theiroriginal IP header information in the “inner” IP headers of the GTP-Uheader. In addition, the “inner” IP header information is normallycopied exactly in the “outer” IP headers of the GTP-U headers. However,in certain circumstances, some values in the outer IP header may bechanged by the GTP-U encapsulation. For example, for 5G NR traffic, theDSCP value in the outer IP header may be changed based on 5G QoS FlowIdentifier (QFI) value of the traffic.

Returning to the method 200 of FIG. 2, at step 204, the classifierapparatus extracts and reads IP header data from the IP packets (PDUs).For non-GTP-U encapsulated IP packets, the IP header data includes,among other markings, a destination address (in the destination IPaddress field), a source address (in the source IP address field), and aDSCP marking (in the differential service field). For GTP-U encapsulatedIP packets, the same information can be found in the outer IP header.FIGS. 2C and 2D (IPv6 and IPv4, respectively) show an IP header and theIP header fields, including: the differential service (DS) field, sourceaddress field, and destination address field.

Referring back to step 204, the source and destination addresses of thedata packets may be read by the classifier apparatus from the Source IPAddress and Destination IP Address fields of the IP headers of the datapackets. The DSCP values may be read by the classifier apparatus fromthe DS field of the IP headers. As an aside, the DSCP value (seeexemplary values in FIG. 2E) indicates the type of traffic beingtransmitted, and thus, the type of treatment the data traffic shouldpreferably receive. For example, a DSCP value 46 normally indicatestraffic that requires “expedited forwarding (EF)” and thus receives veryhigh priority by the traffic manager, while DSCP of 0 indicates trafficthat only necessitates “best effort” (BE) and thus receives routinepriority by the traffic manager.

In step 206, the classifier apparatus uses the extracted source anddestination data to perform an initial (Stage 1) classification of thedata traffic into Low Latency (LL) and Normal/Best Effort (BE) traffic.The sorting algorithm of the classifier in one implementation comparessource and/or destination IP addresses against one or more lists ofimportant/priority IP addresses. In another implementation, gateway orother node names or other identifying data may be used (which then maybe resolved to e.g., an IP address).

In one embodiment, the classifier treats uplink (UL) and downlink (DL)traffic using the same rules (e.g., the same sorting algorithm is usedat subscriber cable modems and at network cable modem terminationsystems). In one such variant, the sorting algorithm can ignoredestination address information, and use only the source IP addresses ofdata packets to assign priority to the data packets. In another suchvariant, the sorting algorithm can ignore the source addressinformation, and use only the destination IP addresses of data packetsto assign priority. In yet another such variant, the sorting algorithmcan use both source and destination address information to assignpriority to data packets. For instance, in one particularimplementation, the sorting algorithm extracts the source anddestination IP addresses, and compares both to a single list of“important” or prioritized IP addresses known to the network operator.The single list of IP addresses can include, e.g., known addresses ofpriority network servers, known addresses of businesspartners/affiliates, and/or known addresses of certaincustomers/subscribers. Data traffic traveling to and from the known IPaddresses would receive higher than normal priority.

In another implementation, the sorting algorithm extracts the source anddestination addresses of data packets, and compares them to differentlists of IP addresses. For example, UL/DL treatment may be asymmetric,such as where data traffic sent to certain customers would receivehigher than normal priority, but data traffic issuing from those samecustomers might not receive higher than normal priority.

In yet another implementation, the classifier apparatus/process comparesthe source addresses against the list of prioritized source addresses,and the result of the source address analysis is used as a gatingcriterion; i.e., to determine whether the destination address analysis(or yet another analysis) should be performed. Similarly, the classifierapparatus/process may analyze the destination address, and the result ofthe destination address analysis determines whether the source addressis also analyzed. The decision to use “source-then-destination” or“destination-then-source” type of analysis might depend for example onwhether the traffic is UL or DL traffic. As will be appreciated, in someuse cases, traffic is more asymmetric (e.g., DL bandwidth for trafficrequested by or to delivered to the end user or UE is significantlyhigher than UL traffic initiated from the user/UE), and as such certainmodels for “source-then-destination” or “destination-then-source”(especially in combination with other parametric-based processing) maybe more advantageous in terms of latency or QoS than others.

Hence, the classifier apparatus may apply different sorting algorithmsand/or different prioritized address lists to UL and DL traffic. This isimplemented by, for example, providing one sorting algorithm toclassifier apparatus or algorithms sorting data traffic for transmissionto an MSO network core (e.g., at small cell CM) and providing adifferent sorting algorithm to classifiers sorting data traffic fortransmission from an MSO core (e.g., at CMTS interface of an HFCnetwork). In one variant, the sorting algorithm ignores source addressinformation, and only uses destination addresses to assign priority toUL data packets, or conversely ignores destination address information,and only uses source addresses to assign priority to DL packets. Thisvariant might be effective because an IP address of a mobile device“on-the-go” is often not useful in determining whether the mobile devicebelongs to a particular customer, subscriber, or company, and as such,reading and analyzing it could be a waste of time/processing resources.For example, a user device attempting to send (upload) data to a knownnetwork server (e.g., MSO server providing real time gaming services)might receive preferential treatment based on the fact that thedestination address for the data traffic is an IP address known andprioritized by the network operator. Similarly, download data traffic toa user device from a known network server might receive preferentialtreatment. Since the user is communicating with the prioritized networkserver, this traffic might receive priority regardless of the userdevice's own location (e.g., IP address/access node/gateway).

Other variations of the foregoing will be appreciated by those ofordinary skill. For instance, the sorting algorithm may ignoredestination address information, and only use source addresses to assignpriority to UL packets, and ignore source addresses, and only usedestination addresses to assign priority to DL packets. Or, the sortingalgorithm may ignore source addresses for both DL and UL traffic, andonly uses destination addresses to sort the data traffic. In one suchapproach, the destination addresses of DL data packets are compared to afirst list of priority destination addresses (e.g., addresses of certaintypes of customers or businesses, addresses of particular customers orbusinesses), while the destination addresses of UL data packets arecompared to a second list of priority addresses (e.g., addresses ofcertain types of network servers, particular service providers,particular network node addresses).

In yet another variant, the sorting algorithm uses the source anddestination addresses for parsing both DL and UL traffic; the source anddestination addresses of DL traffic are compared to one or differentlists of priority DL addresses, while the source and destinationaddresses of UL traffic are compared to one or different lists ofpriority UL addresses. The lists of priority DL addresses and priorityUL addresses may have some overlap, or may be completely different fromeach other.

The aforementioned listing of sorting criteria data (e.g., priorityaddresses) may be a simple listing, such as of all addresses and rangesof addresses that a network operator or vendor has determined shouldreceive priority. In another variant, the list of prioritized data(e.g., addresses) is a hierarchical list or structure, sorted from “mostimportant” to “least important” or according to some other metric. Inyet another variant, the list of prioritized data is divided into tiersof importance. For example, Tier 1 may contain addresses that shouldalways have priority, and be sorted into the Low Latency queue, Tier 2may contain addresses that should have priority if some first conditionis met (e.g., a priority queue or buffer level is below a certainthreshold), and Tier 3 may have priority if some second condition isalternatively or also met (e.g., a priority queue or buffer level isbelow a certain threshold, and a traffic type classifier such as SSTmeets certain criteria).

The lists of prioritized addresses may include for example IP addressesof: specific businesses or corporations (e.g., company partners oraffiliates), specific customers or subscribers, types of businesses orcorporations (e.g., all news network addresses), types of customers orsubscribers, a network operator's own servers and systems, servers orproviders of specific services (e.g., known providers of live video).The addresses may be e.g., complete IP addresses such asAAA.BBB.CCC.DDD, or portions of the foregoing (e.g., routing prefixes orsubnet masks).

The list of prioritized addresses may further be sorted or tiered,depending on, for example, level of customer subscription (which may bereflected by discrete or fuzzy variables or values such as “0-10” or“Gold/Silver/Bronze” or “high/low” or the like), or an internal rankingof e.g., MSO or third-party network servers.

The list of prioritized addresses may also be customized based on otherfactors such as (i) previous traffic behavior and analyses thereof, (ii)user/subscriber ranking/experience, and (ii) network operator prioritiessuch as reliability, fault mitigation, “fair sharing” algorithms, loadbalancing, etc. Furthermore, the list of prioritized addresses or otherprioritization data may be dynamically changed and updated based on, forexample, a traffic-analysis feedback loop, a periodic (hourly, daily,etc.) update, or on an as-needed basis.

In one configuration, the classifier apparatus may also or alternativelyutilize inverse-type logic; e.g., comparison of source and/ordestination addresses against one or more lists of de-prioritizedaddresses. The lists of de-prioritized addresses may be simple,hierarchical, or tiered listings of all addresses and ranges ofaddresses that a network operator or vendor has determined shouldreceive low or normal priority. This listing may include, for example,addresses of specific MSO servers that supply services that do notrequire high upload/download rates. This approach may be useful as agating criterion (e.g., to immediately remove certain traffic fromfurther processing), or in a situation where it is more efficient tomerely identify what is not low-latency as opposed to what is.

Returning to FIG. 2, at step 206, the classifier apparatus may comparethe source and/or destination addresses of every PDU against lists ofprioritized addresses and/or lists of de-prioritized addresses. Thelists of prioritized and de-prioritized addresses may be stored locally(e.g., on storage internal to the classifier apparatus) or remotely. ThePDUs are sorted by the sorting algorithm of the classifier into LowLatency (LL) and Best Effort (BE) traffic. As shown in the embodiment ofFIG. 2, all of the sorted data traffic (LL and BE) is transferred toStage 2 of the classifier to potentially be reclassified.

Returning again to FIG. 2, in step 208, the classifier apparatus usesthe extracted DSCP markings to re-sort the data traffic into Low Latencyand Normal queues. During Stage 2 of the data traffic classificationprocess, the classifier may compare the DSCP values of the data packetsagainst e.g., a list of DSCP values.

In one embodiment, a listing of DSCP values includes selected DSCPvalues that should receive high priority, according to a previouslyestablished determination.

In another embodiment, a listing of DSCP values includes DSCP valuesdivided into tiers of priority.

In yet another embodiment, a listing of DSCP values includes ahierarchical list of DSCP values sorted by priority. For example, one ormore DSCP “thresholds” may be provided to the classifier apparatus andused to divide a hierarchical list of DSCP values. A listing of DSCPvalues used by the classifier may include all possible DSCP values (0 to63) or only a certain subset of all DSCP values. The classifierapparatus in this embodiment sorts the data traffic into Low Latency andNormal queues based on one or more DSCP thresholds that can be used todivide a hierarchical list of DSCP values into separate lists.

The DSCP threshold may be adjusted, depending for example on trafficflows and other dynamic variables. For instance, if the classifierapparatus determines that the LL queue is under-used and the Normalqueue is congested, the classifier may change the DSCP threshold suchthat more data packets are reclassified into the LL queue. In anotherapproach, the DSCP threshold may be predetermined for certain scenarios.For example, the DSCP threshold can be set for particulardays/dates/times of day, on a premises-specific, user-specific, ordevice-specific basis, or certain operational conditions within thenetwork, on a slice-specific basis, or yet other approaches. The DSCPthreshold can also be set for data packets having particular IPaddresses.

In one embodiment, during the Stage 2 re-sorting process, the classifierapparatus/process may apply a first DSCP priority algorithm to datatraffic (labeled as LL in FIGS. 2-2B) in Stage 1 and apply a differentDSCP priority algorithm to data traffic (labeled as BE) in stage 1.

In one exemplary implementation of step 208 of the method(s), theclassifier may apply Stage 2 sorting to UL data packets using ahierarchical list of DSCP values (DSCP List 1) as shown in FIG. 2G. TheDSCP List 1 266 of FIG. 2G illustrates only a few possible DSCP values,sorted by priority; however, in one variant, all 64 currently specifiedDSCP values may be included in a hierarchical DSCP listing. In Stage 2of the sorting process, the classifier apparatus may apply a first DSCPsorting algorithm (e.g., algorithm using Threshold 3 268) to datapackets labeled as LL during the Stage 1 process. The classifier mayapply a second DSCP sorting algorithm (e.g., algorithm using Threshold 1269) to data packets labeled as BE during the Stage 1 process. Forexample, if a previously labeled LL data packet has DSCP value belowThreshold 3, it is re-sorted into the Normal queue (B_(BE)). Otherwise,the LL data packet retains its LL queue label (A_(LL)). On the otherhand, if a previously labeled BE data packet has DSCP value aboveThreshold 1, it is re-sorted into the LL queue (C_(LL)). Otherwise, theBE data packet retains its Normal queue label (D_(BE)).

Note that the lists of IP addresses and DSCP values in FIGS. 2F and 2Gare shown merely to help illustrate the sorting process and are notmeant to be realistic.

In steps 210 and 211, the re-sorted data traffic is sent to the LowLatency and Normal queues, respectively, of the DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0implemented within a CM or a CMTS. In one embodiment, the data packetsscheduled for the Low Latency queue are schedules with a strictpriority. In one implementation, as shown in FIG. 2, all the dataclassified as LL in Stage 1 and kept in LL during Stage 2 (data A_(LL))may have priority over the data classified as Normal/Best Effort inStage 1 and re-classified to LL during Stage 2 (data C_(LL)). In theexemplary methods 220, 240 of FIGS. 2A and 2B, the data packets parsedduring Stages 1 and 2 receive strict priority inside the LL queue of:

(i) AA_(LL), then

(ii) A_(LL), and then

(iii) C_(LL).

On the other hand, in various embodiments, the data packets scheduledfor the Normal queue may receive weighted priority. For example, asshown in the method of FIG. 2, the Normal queue schedule does not alwaysprioritize either B_(BE) traffic or D_(BE) traffic. The scheduled Normalqueue may dynamically change the order of its data packets based onchanges in traffic flow and congestion, as previously described.

Finally, in step 212 of the method 200 of FIG. 2, the parsed datatraffic is transmitted from the CM or CMTS through the relevant bearermedium (e.g., in an HFC network) using the appropriate Low Latency andNormal queues of the DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0 standard.

As shown in the alternate approaches of FIGS. 2A and 2B, some of thesorted data traffic (LL and BE) can be transferred to Stage 2 of theclassifier, and some of the sorted data traffic (AA_(LL) and/or DD_(BE))fed directly to the Low Latency and Normal queues. In one variant (FIG.2A), per steps 225, 226 and 227, the classifier may sort the Low Latencytraffic into definite Low Latency traffic (AA_(LL)) and preliminary LowLatency traffic (LL), and classify the Best Effort traffic into definiteBest Effort traffic (DD_(BE)) and preliminary Best Effort traffic (BE).In step 226, the classifier may send the AA_(LL) data traffic directlyto the LL queue, and in step 227, the classifier may send the DD B_(E)data traffic directly to the Normal/Best Effort queue. The rest of thesorted data traffic (LL and BE) is fed to the second stage of theclassifier (step 228). Per steps 229 and 230, the respective data issent to the LL and Normal queues, and transmitted per step 232.

In another variant, as shown in FIG. 2B, the classifier apparatus mayclassify all traffic into three categories: definite Low Latency traffic(AA_(LL)), preliminary Low Latency traffic (LL), and all Best Efforttraffic (BE). Per step 241, the Stage 1 sort occurs, and in step 242,the classifier sends the AA_(LL) data traffic directly to the LL queueper step 244. The rest of the traffic (LL and BE) is sent to the secondstage of the sorting algorithm (step 243). Per step 246, the bestefforts (B_(BE) and D_(BE)) data is sent to the Normal queue, and datafrom both queues transmitted per step 228.

In one exemplary implementation of the foregoing methods, a classifierapparatus can apply Stage 1 sorting to UL or DL data traffic using oneor more lists of priority IP addresses (e.g., lists as shown in FIG.2F). For instance, UL traffic can be sorted using destination addressesonly, with IP address List 1 260 (FIG. 2F) representing the highestpriority IP destination addresses for UL traffic (e.g., a list of highpriority MSO network servers). The classifier apparatus in this instancecompares data packet IP destination addresses against List 1; if a datapacket IP destination address is found in List 1, the data packet isinitially labeled as LL traffic, and fed to Stage 2 of the classifier.If a data packet IP destination address is not found in List 1, the datapacket is initially labeled as BE traffic and fed to Stage 2 of theclassifier. Similarly, in another variant, UL traffic is sorted usingdestination and source addresses, with List 1 260 representing thehighest priority IP destination addresses for UL traffic (e.g., highestpriority network servers), and List 2 262 representing the highestpriority IP source addresses for UL traffic (e.g., highest prioritycustomers or business partners). If a data packet IP destination addressis found in List 1 260 or the data packet IP source address is found inList 2 262, the data packets is initially labeled as LL traffic and fedto Stage 2 of the classifier. If the data packet source and destinationaddresses are not found in respective priority IP address lists, thedata packet is initially labeled as BE and fed to Stage 2 of theclassifier. In other variants, UL traffic may be sorted using sourceaddresses only.

In another embodiment, three (3) lists 260, 262, and 264 as shown inFIG. 2F are used. In one variant, UL traffic is sorted using destinationaddresses only, IP address List 1 262 represents the highest priority IPdestination addresses for UL traffic (e.g., a list of high priority MSOnetwork servers), IP address List 2 262 represents the second highestpriority IP destination addresses for UL traffic, and IP address List 3264 represent a lowest priority (or non-prioritized) IP destinationaddresses for UL traffic. If a data packet IP destination address isfound in List 1 260, the data packet is labeled as definite Low Latency(AA_(LL)) and fed directly to the LL queue (as seen in step 226). If thedata packet IP destination address is found in List 2 262, the datapacket is initially labeled as LL traffic and fed to Stage 2 of theclassifier. If the data packet IP destination address is found in List 3264, the data packet is labeled as definite Best Effort traffic(DD_(BE)) and fed directly to the Normal queue. If the data packet IPdestination address is not found in List 1, List 2, or List 3, the datapacket is initially labeled as BE and fed to Stage 2 of the classifier.In other variants, UL traffic may be sorted using both source anddestination addresses or using destination addresses only.

FIG. 3 illustrates another embodiment of a method 300 for classifyingdata traffic into Low Latency and Normal queues. In this embodiment, thesorting algorithm classifies data traffic using DSCP values during thefirst stage of the sorting process and reclassifies the data trafficusing source/destination addresses during the second stage of thesorting process.

In step 302 of the method 300, data traffic is received by theclassifier apparatus.

In step 304, the classifier extracts and reads IP header data, includingsource/destination IP addresses and DSCP values, from the received PDUs.Steps 302 and 304 can be implemented similarly to steps 202 and 204 ofFIG. 2 previously described.

In step 306 of method 300, during Stage 1 of the sorting process, theclassifier apparatus uses the extracted DSCP markings to sort the datatraffic into Low Latency and Normal queues. In one embodiment, theclassifier uses a sorting algorithm to compare DSCP values for upstreamand/or downstream traffic to one or more listings of DSCP values.

The listing of DSCP values includes for instance selected DSCP valuesthat should receive a certain priority, according to a previouslyestablished or dynamically established determination. In anotherapproach, the listing of DSCP values includes DSCP values divided intotiers of priority. In yet another approach, the listing of DSCP valuesincludes a hierarchical list of DSCP values sorted by priority. One ormore DSCP thresholds may be provided to the classifier and used todivide a hierarchical list of DSCP values. The listing of DSCP valuesused by the classifier may include all possible DSCP values or onlycertain DSCP values.

The classifier apparatus may also use the DSCP listing to parse the datatraffic into Low Latency and Normal queues based on a predetermined DSCPthreshold. In one embodiment, the aforementioned hierarchical listing ofDSCP values may be different for uplink and downlink data traffic, oridentical for both. In another embodiment, the hierarchical listing ofDSCP values is identical for both, but the threshold of DSCP priorityused by the sorting algorithm is different for UL and DL data traffic.

Referring back to step 306 of FIG. 3, Stage 1 of the sorting algorithmuses DSCP values to parse data traffic into Low Latency (LL) andNormal/Best effort (BE) traffic. The LL and BE traffic is thentransferred to Stage 2 of the sorting algorithm. In some embodiments ofthe disclosure, some of the data traffic output from the Stage 1 processcan bypass Stage 2 of the sorting algorithm, and be transferred directlyto the Low Latency and Normal queues (in processes similar to FIGS. 2Aand 2B).

In step 308, the classifier apparatus uses the extracted source anddestination IP addresses to re-sort DSCP-sorted data traffic into LowLatency and Normal traffic queues. In one embodiment, the sortingalgorithm of the classifier compares the source and/or destination IPaddresses against at least one list of prioritized IP addresses. In onevariant, the classifier applies different sorting algorithms and/ordifferent prioritized address lists to UL and DL traffic during thestage 2 re-sorting process, the classifier may also apply a first IPaddress priority algorithm/list to data traffic labeled as Low Latencyin Stage 1 and apply a different IP address priority algorithm/list todata traffic labeled as Normal in Stage 2. Step 308 of theclassification method 300 of FIG. 3 can be configured to apply sortingalgorithms (as described with respect to step 206 of the classificationmethod of FIG. 2) as well the approaches of FIGS. 2A and 2B.

In step 310 and 311, the re-sorted data traffic is sent to the LowLatency and Normal queues respectively. The data packets scheduled forthe Low Latency queue are scheduled with strict priority, and the datapackets scheduled for the Normal queue are scheduled with a weightedpriority. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, all the data classified as LLin Stage 1 and kept in LL during Stage 2 (data A_(LL)) has priority overthe data classified as Best Effort in Stage 1 and re-classified to LLduring Stage 2 (data C_(LL)). Data traffic in the Normal queue (B_(BE)and D_(BE)) may be dynamically reclassified, based on e.g., changes intraffic flow and congestion.

Finally, in step 312 of the method 300, the parsed data traffic istransmitted through the cable plant (using CM or CMTS devices) using theappropriate Low Latency and Normal queues compliant with the DOCSIS 3.1or D 4.0 standard.

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method 400 for backhauling data trafficusing DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0 over a cable bearer, in accordance with aspectsof the present disclosure. The method of FIG. 4 may be used with any ofthe exemplary sorting methods described in the present disclosure.

In step 402, a network device receives data traffic in the form of datapackets. In one embodiment, the data traffic is 4G/4.5G/5G wireless datatraffic is transmitted by a user device and received at an access node(e.g., a small cell or 5G gNB) having a cable modem and connection to anHFC network (operated by an MSO). In another embodiment, the datatraffic is transmitted from an MSO network core and received at an HFCnetwork hub having a CMTS. In yet another approach, an MNO-operatedsmall cell generates data that is backhauled by a CM/CMTS of the MSO.

In step 404, the network device may determine that/identify part or allof the data that traffic needs to be transported/backhauled using cable,and send or route the data traffic to a classifier apparatus. In oneembodiment, the aforementioned small cell network access node mayreceive 5G NR data traffic from a user device (e.g., 5G NR UE), anddetermine that the data traffic needs to be backhauled to the MSOnetwork core. In another embodiment, a network hub receives data trafficfrom the MSO network core and determines that the data traffic needs tobe transported to a wireless access node connected to a user device.

In step 406, the classifier parses or sorts the data traffic into two ormore categories or classes using e.g., the methods of FIGS. 2-3. Forexample, the two categories may be the Low Latency and Normal queuespreviously described.

In step 408, the parsed data traffic is transported through the selectedbackhaul medium; e.g., via an HFC cable plant as an RF signal using theappropriate Low Latency and Normal queues of the DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0standards.

In step 410, the data traffic is received from the distribution networkby a CM (located at e.g., a network access node) or a CMTS (located at aheadend or hub of an HFC network), and then forwarded to the appropriatedata traffic destination. For example, a CM located at the access nodecan use a wireless interface of the access node to wirelessly transmitdata traffic to a user device. A CMTS located at a network hub cantransport data to the network core using an optical ring connection, andto the Internet or an MNO network via e.g., the MSO backbone.

FIG. 4A is a ladder diagram illustrating exemplary data transmissions,as described in FIG. 4. The data transmissions of FIG. 4A includecommunications to and from a wireless user device/user equipment (UE)(e.g., a 5G NR enabled connected mobile phone), through a network accessnode (e.g., gNB or small cell) having a wireline or fiber backhaul to adistribution network (e.g., an HFC network).

In one approach, if the UE does not have an established session, theaccess node can generate and transmit a session establishment request(e.g., a 5G NR PDU request) to a network core (5GC) located at orconnected to an MSO network core using a cable backhaul connection. Thesession request is transmitted from a CM (located at or near the accessnode) through an HFC distribution network to a CMTS/M-CMTS/CCAP of thedistribution network. The CMTS examines the session request andtransfers it to the 5G Core (5GC) functionality located inside the MSOnetwork core. In another embodiment, the 5G Core functionality may be incommunication, but located outside of the MSO network core. In responseto the session request, the session management function (SMF) within the5GC establishes a PDU session, assigns IP address and QoS profile to theUE, and sends the IP address and QoS profile to the UE, as shown in FIG.4A.

If/once the UE has an established data session, the UE may send andreceive 4G/4.5G/5G data traffic through the access node, using the samecable backhaul as described above. In one example of upload (UL) datatraffic, the UE transmits data packets to the access node, the accessnode uses a classifier apparatus (CA) to parse the data traffic into LowLatency and Normal queues and transmits the parsed data traffic (using aCM) over DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 using a cable distribution network (e.g., an HFCnetwork) connected to a CMTS, the CMTS forwards the data traffic to anMSO network core/backbone, and the MSO core forwards the data traffic tofurther services (e.g., Internet, an MNO network, IPTV, etc). In oneexample of downlink (DL) communication, data traffic is transmitted fromservers/services connected to or located at an MSO core to a hub in thenetwork. The data traffic is then sorted by a classifier into LowLatency and Normal queues and transmitted (from a CMTS) through a cabledistribution network to a wireless access node. The access node thenwirelessly transmits the data packets to a user device/equipment (UE).

FIG. 4B illustrates another exemplary method 420 for backhauling datatraffic using DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0 over a cable bearer, in accordance withaspects of the present disclosure. The method of FIG. 4B may also beused with any of the exemplary sorting methods described in the presentdisclosure.

In step 422, a network device receives data traffic in the form of datapackets. In one embodiment, the data traffic is 4G/4.5G/5G wireless datatraffic is transmitted by a user device and received at an access node(e.g., a small cell or 5G gNB) having a cable modem and connection to anHFC network (operated by an MSO).

In step 424, one or more 5G NR network slices that are to be utilized bythe UE-anchored traffic are identified, such as via SST or othermechanisms previously described herein.

At step 426, the network device may then determine that/identify part orall of the data that traffic needs to be transported/backhauled usingcable, and send or route the data traffic to a classifier apparatus.Note that not all backhauled data may need to be classified; forinstance, some data may be marked for different routing, or be intendedfor local consumption by the receiving node. Since a UE can sustain upto eight (8) different slices, the determination of step 426 may beconducted on a per-slice basis as well. As such, the classifierapparatus can be thought of a virtual parallel slice classificationprocessor.

In step 428, the classifier processes/sorts the data traffic into e.g.,two or more categories or classes using e.g., the methods of FIGS. 2-3.For example, the two categories may be the Low Latency and Normal queuespreviously described. Again, such processing/sorting may be on aper-slice basis if desired.

In step 430, the parsed data traffic is transported through the selectedbackhaul medium; e.g., via an HFC cable plant as an RF signal using theappropriate Low Latency and Normal queues of the DOCSIS 3.1 or 4.0standards.

In step 432, the data traffic is received from the distribution networkby a CM (located at e.g., a network access node) or a CMTS (located at aheadend or hub of an HFC network), and then forwarded to the appropriatedata traffic destination via the appropriate slice(s). Some or all ofthe network slice function/apparatus allocation may be performed by theMSO core, and/or the MNO (e.g., within the 5GC or other entity). Assuch, the MSO may “own” part of each slice, and hence coordinationbetween MNO and MSO is contemplated for at least such purposes (i.e.,setting up an end-to-end or partial slice in support of certain classesof traffic).

Network Architecture—

FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary network architecture 500 having adistribution network 512 (e.g., an HFC network) useful for backhaulingsmall cell data traffic or other data traffic. A cable modem (CM) 502may be located at and/or be connected to a wireless access node 520(e.g., 4G/4.5G/5G enabled radio access node). The access node 520 may belocated at customer or business premises, along the side of a road,etc., and may be pole mounted, surface mounted, buried, and/orco-located with other MSO equipment. It may also be an MNO-operated gNBor similar which is backhauled by e.g., the MSO CM 502 or similar. TheCM 502 is connected through a physical cable to the distribution network512. Data communications from the access node 520 may be transmitted(backhauled) over DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 using cable infrastructure of thedistribution network 512 to, e.g., a cable modem termination system(CMTS) 504 of the HFC network of a CCAP-compliant entity, depending onarchitecture (e.g., as an MHA or M-CMTS or converged/unified CCAP). TheCMTS/M-CMTS/CCAP 504, located at a headend or hub 506 of the HFCnetwork, is connected to the MSO network core/backbone 506. The MSOnetwork core 506 may include or be connected to various MSO services,4G/4.5G/5G Core functionality (e.g., 5GC), the Internet 508, and variousMNO networks 510. The MNO networks 510 are connected to their ownradio/access nodes 516 that provide cell or other services to users.

FIG. 6 illustrates a typical service provider network configurationwhich may comprise part of the cable backhaul network architecture 500described herein.

In one embodiment, this service provider network 600 may providebackbone and backhaul functions from various network nodes, includingthe service provider's own network nodes and network nodes belonging tocomplementary network architectures (e.g. small cell network nodes), toother network nodes, premises, or users/subscribers. The serviceprovider network 600 may also provide delivery of linear and other typesof content to network users or subscribers.

The MSO network architecture 600 of FIG. 6 is particularly useful forthe delivery of packetized content (e.g., encoded digital contentcarried within a packet or frame structure or protocol) consistent withthe various aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to on-demandand broadcast content (e.g., live video programming), the system of FIG.6 may deliver Internet data and OTT (over-the-top) services to the endusers via the Internet protocol (IP) and TCP (i.e., over the DOCSIS orin-band QAM bearer), although other protocols and transport mechanismsof the type well known in the digital communication art may besubstituted.

The network architecture 600 of FIG. 6 generally includes one or moreheadends 601 in communication with at least one hub 603 via an opticalring 607. The distribution hub 603 is able to provide content to various“client” devices 622 (which may include CPE such as DSTBs or the like),and gateway devices 620 as applicable, via an interposed networkinfrastructure 605. The gateway device 620 and some of the clientdevices 622 are connected to the network infrastructure through cablemodem (CM) devices 628, the latter which in one embodiment include theclassifier apparatus (CA) as shown. Moreover, as required, theCMTS/M-CMTS/CCAP 616 of the MSO network 600 may include a CA as shown.In one variant, some of the functionality of an integrated or single CAas previously described herein with respect to the methods of FIGS. 2-3may be distributed across the different “local” and “network” CAcomponents, or in another approach each CA only handles one direction ofrouting (i.e., UP for the CM, and DL for the CMTS/M-CMTS-CCAP).

In the MSO network 600 of FIG. 6, various content sources 602 are usedto provide content to content servers 604. Content may be received froma local, regional, or network content library, from linear analog ordigital feeds, as well as third party content sources. Internet contentsources 610 (such as e.g., a web server) provide Internet content to apacketized content origin server(s) 606. Other IP content (such as voiceover IP (VoIP) and/or IPTV content) may also be received from subscriberand non-subscriber devices (e.g., a PC or smartphone-originated usermade video).

The network architecture 600 of FIG. 6 may further include a legacymultiplexer/encrypter/modulator (MEM; not shown). The content server 604and packetized content server 606 may be coupled via a LAN to a headendswitching device 608 such as an 802.3z Gigabit Ethernet (or “10G”)device. For downstream delivery via the MSO infrastructure (i.e., QAMs),video and audio content is multiplexed at the headend 601 andtransmitted to the edge switch device 612 (which may also comprise an802.3z Gigabit Ethernet device) via the optical ring 607.

In one exemplary content delivery paradigm, MPEG-based video content(e.g., MPEG-2, H.264/AVC or H.265/HEVC) may be delivered to userIP-based client devices over the relevant physical transport (e.g.,DOCSIS channels); that is as MPEG-over-IP-over-MPEG. Specifically, thehigher layer MPEG or other encoded content may be encapsulated using anIP network-layer protocol, which then utilizes an MPEGpacketization/container format of the type well known in the art fordelivery over the RF channels or other transport, such as via amultiplexed transport stream (MPTS). Delivery in such packetized modesmay be unicast, multicast, or broadcast.

In aspect of the present invention, IP packets associated with a smallcell are received by small cell access nodes 624, processed, backhauled(from CMs 628) to the MSO network 605 (e.g., the HFC distributionnetwork) using DOCSIS 3.1/4.0 over cable, and forwarded to a network hub603, including a cable modem termination system (CMTS), M-CMTS or CCAP616 of the MSO network. The CMTS 616 examines the packets, and forwardspackets intended for the local network to the edge switch. Other packetsare in one variant discarded or routed to another component. The edgeswitch 612 forwards the packets receive from the CMTS 616 to the opticalring 607 or to the QAM modulator, which transmits the packets on one ormore physical (QAM-modulated RF) channels (through the client CMs 628)to the CPE devices 620, 622. The IP packets are typically transmitted onRF channels that are different than the “in band” RF channels used forthe broadcast video and audio programming, although this is not arequirement.

Exemplary Network Access Node—

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary configuration of anetwork access node 720 having a cable backhaul connection, useful foroperation in accordance with the present disclosure. In one embodiment,the network node may be, may be part of, or be connected to a small cellof a wireless network (e.g., 4G, 4.5G, 5G network) For instance, theaccess node may be a 3GPP 5G NR-compliant node, a CBRS CBSD, femtocell,or other such node. The network access node 720 of FIG. 7 may be used inthe network architectures of FIGS. 5 and 6.

The network node may include a processor apparatus or subsystem 706, amemory module 710, and a wireless network interface 708 (including e.g.,an antenna apparatus) for communicating with wireless network devicessuch as UE, CBRS FWA, etc. In one embodiment, the processor apparatus706 may include one or more of a digital signal processor,microprocessor, field-programmable gate array, or plurality ofprocessing components mounted on one or more substrates. The processor706 may also comprise an internal cache memory. In one embodiment, theprocessing apparatus 706 is configured to execute at least one computerprogram stored in the memory module 710 to support data classifierfunctionality and other network node functionality. Other embodimentsmay implement such functionality within dedicated hardware, logic,and/or specialized co-processors (not shown).

The processor apparatus may be connected to the data traffic classifierapparatus (CA) 704 and a cable modem (CM) 702. The classifier includes anumber of functional modules, implemented as software or firmware,including a packet header reader 714 and a sorting process 722. Thedistinct functional modules 714,722 of the classifier may comprise theirown hardware/software environment, and/or be distributed across multiplelogical domains. The sorting process 722 may be in logical communicationwith sorting parameters 716 and a sorting algorithm 718, which may bestored locally on the classifier apparatus (e.g., within a localdatabase as shown), supplied from another part of the network node, orsupplied from a remote location (e.g., from wireless network or HFCnetwork). The sorting process 722 may implement a data sorting methodaccording to one embodiment of the present disclosure, including sortingmethods of FIGS. 1-3. In some variants, the packet buffer 712 and/ormemory module 710 of the network node may at least temporarily store thereceived packets (e.g., as a FIFO or LIFO buffer depending on packettype) for analysis by the classifier apparatus. The CA 704, as describedabove, and various functions thereof may additionally be implemented inother portions of an HFC network. For example, a CMTS/M-CMTS/CCAP of anMSO network may include or be connected to a classifier device orclassifier functions (e.g., sorting process) in order to properlyforward data traffic to client devices (through the HFC network) aspreviously shown in FIG. 6.

The cable modem 702 (CM) may be provided locally at the network accessnode 720 and may be wirelessly and/or wireline connected to the CA 704,the process apparatus of the network node, and other entities of thenetwork node. The CM 702 includes a CM processor 730, a memory 728, amodulator/demodulator 732, and a cable (e.g., HFC) interface 734 whichmay be used to transmit and receive data through an HFC network. The CMmemory 728 may be used to store/buffer the data packets sorted by theclassifier into Low Latency queue 724 and Normal queue 726. In theexemplary embodiment, the CA 704 is separated from the CM 702. In asecond embodiment, the classifier may be integrated as a part of the CM.In yet another embodiment, at least some of the functionality of theclassifier may be alternatively installed, virtualized, and/ordistributed within other network entities.

In the exemplary embodiment, the network node 720 is configured toreceive data via the wireless network interface (s) 708 from, e.g., aclient device, use the CA 704 to evaluate and sort the packets making upthe data traffic, and use the CM 702 to transmit the data traffic overHFC cable using QoS support of DOCSIS 3.1 or D 4.0 standards (i.e.,sorting into LL and Normal queues of DOCSIS 3.1).

In one example, as discussed elsewhere herein, the CA 704 is configuredto read data associated with at least one packet of the receivedtraffic. In one embodiment, the packet/header reader 714 may beconfigured to read and/or extract the destination IP address, the sourceIP address, and the DSCP value(s) of a given packet from an IP header anIP outer header of the data packet. The data traffic may include e.g.,5G NR compliant GTP-U encapsulated data packets and the DSCP values ofthe data traffic are based on QoS Flow ID (QFI) of the data packets.

The sorting process 722 is configured to use the sorting algorithm 718to compare the extracted IP source/destination addresses and the DSCPvalues to the sorting parameters 716. As previously described, thesorting parameters can include e.g., at least one listing of IP sourceand/or destination addresses that should be prioritized by the CA; suchlistings may also be maintained within the local database, or benetwork-based (e.g., within the MSO cloud or headend). In oneembodiment, the sorting parameters include at least one listing of DSCPvalues, sorted by priority, and at least one DSCP threshold.

FIG. 8 illustrates another exemplary embodiment of the enhanced accessnode according to the present disclosure. In this embodiment, a 5G NRgNB is used as the access node and includes a CM 702 and CA 704 as inthe embodiment of FIG. 7. In one variant, the CA 704 is disposed withinthe CU 804 of the gNB. As a brief aside, the CU 804 (also known asgNB-CU) is a logical node within the NR architecture that communicateswith the NG Core 803, and includes gNB functions such as transfer ofuser data, session management, mobility control, RAN sharing, andpositioning; however, other functions are allocated exclusively to theDU(s) 806 (also known as gNB-DUs) per various “split” options. The CU804 communicates user data and controls the operation of the DU(s) 806,via corresponding front-haul (Fs) user plane and control planeinterfaces 808, 810.

In another variant, the CA 704 may be disposed completely or in partwithin a DU 806 of the gNB. For example, where only a certain one ortype of DU would be operative to receive low-latency data or handlecertain types of UE slice “requests,” the CA may be allocated to that DUalone.

Note that the functions of the CA 704, including its individual stagesas previously described, may be allocated across two or more entities,whether within the gNB 802 illustrated or otherwise. Moreover,heterogeneous stage embodiments are envisioned (whether for the gNB orother types of devices), such as where a common second stage (e.g.,Stage 2 described above) is allocated to the CU 804, and different typesof Stage 1 processing are performed at e.g., two or more of the DU 806.For example, a certain DU or type of DU may benefit most from using oneform of sorting within the first stage, whereas another might benefitmore from another type.

Conversely, the Stage 2 (or subsequent, if any) processing or sortingmay be made heterogeneous with respect to a common Stage 1 process. Forexample, the CU/CA may apply one or more dynamically selected Stage 2algorithms based on which DU is sending it packet data.

Within such an architecture 800, a gNB-DU 806 (or ngeNB-DU) is under thecontrol of a single gNB-CU 804. When a gNB-DU is initiated (includingpower-up), it executes an F1 SETUP procedure (which is generally modeledafter the S1 SETUP procedures of LTE) to inform the controlling gNB-CUof, inter alia, any number of parameters such as e.g., the number ofcells (together with the identity of each particular cell) in the F1SETUP REQUEST message. These messages are in one variant modified (e.g.,via their relevant Information Element or IE) to include data relatingto: (i) requested or served slices per UE, (ii) IP header, DSCP, or QFIdata for packets received, which can be utilized by the CU/CA inconfiguring the appropriate sorting algorithms

It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the disclosure aredescribed in terms of a specific sequence of steps of a method, thesedescriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of thedisclosure, and may be modified as required by the particularapplication. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional undercertain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality maybe added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance oftwo or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered to beencompassed within the disclosure disclosed and claimed herein.

While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointedout novel features of the disclosure as applied to various embodiments,it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changesin the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be madeby those skilled in the art without departing from the disclosure. Thisdescription is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should betaken as illustrative of the general principles of the disclosure. Thescope of the disclosure should be determined with reference to theclaims.

It will be further appreciated that while certain steps and aspects ofthe various methods and apparatus described herein may be performed by ahuman being, the disclosed aspects and individual methods and apparatusare generally computerized/computer-implemented. Computerized apparatusand methods are necessary to fully implement these aspects for anynumber of reasons including, without limitation, commercial viability,practicality, and even feasibility (i.e., certain steps/processes simplycannot be performed by a human being in any viable fashion).

What is claimed is:
 1. A computerized apparatus configured forclassifying packetized data traffic, the computerized apparatuscomprising: a digital processing apparatus; one or more networkinterfaces in communication with the digital processing apparatus; and astorage device in communication with the digital processing apparatusand having at least one computer program disposed thereon in the form ofa plurality of instructions configured to, when executed on the digitalprocessing apparatus: receive a plurality of data packets issued from auser device; access first data from the plurality of data packetsindicative of at least one destination network address; access seconddata from the plurality of data packets indicative of at least one QoSmanagement parameter; based at least on the accessed first data, cause afirst sorting of the received plurality of data packets into eitherlow-latency traffic or best-effort traffic; based at least on theaccessed second data, subsequent to the first sorting, cause are-sorting of the received plurality of data packets; and in accordancewith the re-sorting, utilize one or more of a low-latency bearer or abest-efforts bearer each configured for carrying respective ones of theplurality of data packets from the computerized apparatus to the atleast one destination network address.
 2. The computerized apparatus ofclaim 1, wherein the first data comprises a destination IP address forupstream IP packets, and the second data comprises DSCP (differentiatedservices code point) data.
 3. The computerized apparatus of claim 2,wherein the DSCP (differentiated services code point) data comprisesDSCP data obtained via an S1 interface, and the computerized apparatuscomprises a 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) femtocell or node.
 4. Thecomputerized apparatus of claim 2, wherein the DSCP (differentiatedservices code point) data comprises DSCP data obtained via an N3interface, and the computerized apparatus comprises a 3GPP 5G NR (NewRadio) compliant gNB or wireless node.
 5. The computerized apparatus ofclaim 4, wherein the plurality of instructions are further configuredto, when executed on the digital processing apparatus, utilize thirddata within the plurality of data packets, the third data comprising QFI(QoS Flow Identification) data found in one or more encapsulationheaders of the plurality of data packets.
 6. The computerized apparatusof claim 4, wherein the plurality of instructions are further configuredto, when executed on the digital processing apparatus, utilize fourthdata, the fourth data comprising data relating to available bandwidth ona data network in communication with the computerized apparatus used forcarrying the plurality of data packets.
 7. The computerized apparatus ofclaim 6, wherein the utilization of the fourth data comprises adjustingat least one sorting algorithm used for the utilization of either thelow-latency bearer or the best-efforts bearer.
 8. A computerized methodof parsing packetized data traffic, the computerized method comprising:receiving a plurality of data packets; obtaining first parameters of thedata packets; obtaining second parameters of the data packets;performing a first evaluation of the plurality of data packets using thefirst parameters; based on the first evaluation, assigning a firstclassification to first ones of the plurality of data packets andassigning a second classification to second ones of plurality of datapackets; performing a second evaluation of the plurality of data packetsusing the second parameters; based on the second evaluation, assigning athird classification to at least some of the first ones of the pluralityof data packets assigned the first classification, maintaining the firstclassification to any remaining of the first ones of the plurality ofdata packets assigned the first classification, assigning a fourthclassification to at least some of the second ones of the plurality ofdata packets assigned the second classification, and maintaining thesecond classification to any remaining of the second ones of theplurality of data packets assigned the second classification; sendingdata packets assigned the first classification and data packets assignedthe fourth classification to a first queue; and sending data packetsassigned the second classification and data packets assigned the thirdclassification to a second queue.
 9. The computerized method of claim 8,further comprising extracting Internet Protocol (IP) headers from theplurality of data packets; and wherein the obtaining the firstparameters comprises reading IP addresses from the IP headers.
 10. Thecomputerized method of claim 9, wherein: the plurality of data packetscomprises upstream data traffic; reading the IP addresses comprisesreading only destination IP addresses of the plurality of data packets;and the performing the first evaluation comprises comparing thedestination IP addresses against one or more lists of priority IPaddresses.
 11. The computerized method of claim 9, wherein: theplurality of data packets comprises downstream data traffic; the readingthe IP addresses comprises reading only source IP addresses of theplurality of data packets; and the performing the first evaluationcomprises comparing the source IP addresses against one or more lists ofpriority IP addresses.
 12. The computerized method of claim 8, furthercomprising extracting Internet Protocol (IP) headers from the pluralityof data packets; and wherein the obtaining the second parameterscomprises obtaining differentiated services code point (DSCP) valuesfrom the IP headers.
 13. The computerized method of claim 12, whereinthe IP headers comprise at least one IPv6 address associated with ahigh-priority data traffic network destination.
 14. The computerizedmethod of claim 8, further comprising obtaining third parameters of thedata packets, the third parameters comprising QFI (QoS FlowIdentification) data, the QFI data utilized in assigning of at least ofsaid first classification, second classification, or thirdclassification.
 15. A computerized apparatus configured for classifyingpacketized data traffic, the computerized apparatus comprising: adigital processing apparatus; one or more network interfaces incommunication with the digital processing apparatus; and a storagedevice in communication with the digital processing apparatus and havingat least one computer program disposed thereon in the form of aplurality of instructions configured to, when executed on the digitalprocessing apparatus, cause the computerized apparatus to: receive aplurality of data packets; determine whether the data packets compriseupstream or downstream data traffic; based on a determination that thedata packets comprise upstream data traffic, apply a first sortingalgorithm; and based on a determination that the data packets comprisedownstream data traffic, apply a second sorting algorithm different fromthe first sorting algorithm.
 16. The computerized apparatus of claim 15,wherein the application of the first sorting algorithm and theapplication of the second sorting algorithm are each based at least onone or more differentiated services code point (DSCP) values obtainedfrom the received plurality of data packets.
 17. The computerizedapparatus of claim 16, wherein: the plurality of instructions arefurther configured to, when executed on the digital processingapparatus, cause the computerized apparatus to determine a plurality ofpriority levels associated with the one or more DSCP values, andperformance of an evaluation of the plurality of priority levels; andthe application of the first sorting algorithm and the application ofthe second sorting algorithm are each further based on determination ofrespective priority levels associated with the received plurality ofdata packets.
 18. The computerized apparatus of claim 15, wherein: thedetermination that the data packets comprise upstream data trafficcomprises a determination of one or more destination network addressesdetected within the received plurality of data packets; and thedetermination that the data packets comprise downstream data traffic adetermination of one or more source network addresses detected withinthe received plurality of data packets.
 19. The computerized apparatusof claim 15, wherein the first sorting algorithm comprises an assignmentof at least a portion of the plurality of data packets into alow-latency data transmission queue and at least another portion of theplurality of data packets into a best-effort data transmission queue.20. The computerized apparatus of claim 19, wherein the second sortingalgorithm comprises, subsequent to performance of the first sortingalgorithm, an assignment of at least a portion of the plurality of datapackets into another low-latency data transmission queue and at leastanother portion of the plurality of data packets into anotherbest-effort data transmission queue.